Those that uncover what they believe is a bible code seem to find what they are looking for. What is interesting is that when they do a query and find a good match, the words are often right next to each other. Sometimes the words have no gaps modern words that seem odd - located in such an old text. Why do these large obvious words and couplings not stand out more until looked for? How is it that code has room for a bible code, without all of the code's answers interfering. It seems to embody every thing and nothing.
In this way the bible reminds me of a few divine peaces of art I've seen, and a few that I've made. Like the bible, this art is so balanced that that there is not one mistake or unbalanced part that distracts one's perception while looking at it (or listening to it in the case of music). Yet, while absent of a single overpowering item, works of art like this seem to reflect an endless stream of items.
Not all great art is 4 dimensional, but all 4dimensional renderings are great art. What is great art? How do you know when you are seeing it? Have you ever had that feeling inside your gut when you made a certain decision, or met a certain person, where it felt like it was meant to be. Where it feels so clear that it almost feels like dj vu? That's great art. You look at it and nothing in it's elements are misplaced or missing. And, while experiencing the art, or the song, or the person, you cannot imagine how it could nor should be changed in any way perfect truth no false moves no lies.
The only way to intentionally produce this, is by removing yourself from the process. That is why it is so rare to see the pompous create great art: it demands complete humility to be able to step out of the way and not distort what is there so you can claim responsibility. To make this art, one needs to let the divine come visible. Must apply what's there and nothing else. Much more rare than great art, is 4th dimension great art true pathways to the divine. To make the great art 4D, one must be able to paint what's there, yet balance the elements not only within a frame, but must balance all the frames, all the aggregates, all the antecedents, all the moments.
This is not an easy task; however, it is not as difficult as one might think either. This is where a lot of smart artists go wrong, they have such esteem of their intellect, that they try to build it themselves. This will never work transcendent art is by definition not cleverly thought up. And, the infinite, inter relation would be impossible to design without limiting.
But, developing perception to absorb the information, and, developing the energy and skills to record 4d divine, is hard enough. The way it is done, is by "breathing" dabs of life onto the vision, never painting from ones knowledge of form, never listening to those idiot college art teachers that try to sell you on the notion that art is all about sketching forms, and approaching that way art is about vision and passion and communication, not about self-centered, limited, form reproduction. Art should not reproduce anything. True art puts a sheet over the ghost. That's all
David R Wallace 22 Aug 2011
The point with the bible code thoughts (started in previous post here: Chasing down the 4th dimension) is that those researching this, seem to find whatever they set out to look for. And. Suppose the bible code is divine in nature. I am wondering if the "divine" aspect of the bible might be more than coded text - intentionally arranged inside the book, brilliantly positioned inside a limited number of pages. Perhaps the "divine" of the bible, is stored within, or unleashed by, the method of looking- or the individual perceiving; divine looking processes rather than divine messages being looked at.The researchers develop different formulas, patterns, "matrices" that search and process the bible's content. And they develop these formulas, in depth, until the formula produces something they recognize - which must also be something they were "looking for," right? I am not necessarily suggesting that the endeavor is not divine, and that it is merely a intricate trick of mathematics. But, if there is genuine, from the soul of God, divine knowledge coming forth from the bible, perhaps the coding is related to the those looking, and the bible the perfect mirror, reflection of the looking, like this divine art. Could great art be more the lack of something than the presence of something. Could the mark of great art be related to the extent to which it can reflect truth back to the viewer and return the least amount of fiction or distortion. Perhaps it is the ambiguity, the divine balance and ambiguity, that makes the bible divine. So perfectly crafted to not mean one thing that it serves as a divine tool by reflecting everything.
Like white light. Like the sun. Like love that is open and never one defined vision; like real love cannot be invented or pretended; love is pure truth of boundless reflection -- dependable truth to the given's looking.
Love, 4D, divine art, Shakespeare perhaps; maybe Whitman but surely Leonardo, Beethoven?: Is it this, and just simply this? Uncontaminated essences, exposed not created, pure truth with no invented assertions to contaminate the experience of experiences. Perhaps Beethoven lets us find what we can find, discover what our divine searches were given to look for, envision the Divine prophecies if that is the looking that one's been given to reflect upon and unto certain divine canvases translated by certain divine artist. Work's of art who's divine secrets might not lie in what secrets within them lie woven, but actually in the divine simplicity of not obscuring.
Reply